I think this is my last rant for a while. I realize that this has not been an active year for this blog and that most of my posts over the past two years have been rants, which are not generally sexy. That said, this is another rant.
Typically, when people argue the “slut” label often attached to the label “bisexual,” they state, “Bisexuality is not polyamory.” This is true, but I think fails to address the bigger point that bisexuality is not a checklist.
This is not going to be popular, and may even be deemed offensive by some. I am not trying to insult or be incendiary. That said, this is genuinely my opinion.
I think that the common, modern uses of the terms “pansexual” and “queer” are often employed to solve a problem that does not exist: that “bisexual” is too limiting. Some argue that the “bi” in “bisexual” means that a bisexual person can only be attracted to men and to women, not to more fluid dynamics.
Huh. I just realized that hating bisexuals is an extension of misogyny and phallic worship.
“Exsqueeze me?” you ask incredulously. It may seem odd, but follow me for a moment. Please excuse the sweeping generalizations and crude stereotypes along the path.